Ignas - Delegate Communication Thread

Date Voted: October 2, 2025

24. Proposal: ZKsync Prividium Roadshow (Tally)

  • Vote: Yes

  • Rationale: This proposal helps expand ZKsync’s presence globally, builds stronger connections with local communities, and attracts new developers and users.

    Voted yes!

25. Proposal: [ZIP-12] V29 Interop Messaging Upgrade (Tally)

  • Vote: Yes

  • Rationale: I support ZIP-12 as it enables secure, low cost interoperability between ZKsync Chains, reuses proven mechanisms, and has passed external audits.

    This upgrade strengthens scalability and lays the foundation for future cross chain features.

26. Proposal: [ZIP-13] Adding a ZKsync OS CTM (Tally)

  • Vote: Yes

  • Rationale: Voted yes on ZIP - 13.

    This proposal enables the safe introduction of ZKsync OS through a dedicated CTM, ensuring isolation from existing chains while allowing faster, cheaper proofs via the Airbender prover.

    It provides a controlled environment for early testing and feedback without risking current chain security, setting the foundation for a smooth transition to decentralized governance once the system matures.

Date Voted: October 23, 2025

27. Proposal: [TPP-11] ZKsync Governance System Infrastructure Funding (Tally)

  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: Voting yes. zkSync DAO will operate more professionally, gain the ability to self fund essential activities, and maintain both safety and transparency in token issuance.

28. Proposal: [TPP-12] ZKnomics Token Staking (Tally)

  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: This pilot strengthens ZKsync governance and prepares core staking infrastructure for decentralization. Support the proposal!

Date voted: November 14, 2025

29. Proposal: [TPP-13] Assign Minter Role to Gov Infra Capped Minter (Tally)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: Easy yes.

    This proposal simply enables the previously approved Governance Infrastructure Funding program (TPP-11) by granting the Child Capped Minter the necessary minting rights.

    It does not change any program design or incentives, and ensures the system can operate as intended.

30. Proposal: [ZIP-14] Upgrade ZK Token with Permissionless Burn Function (Tally)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: This upgrade introduces essential burn primitives needed for future ZKnomics mechanisms while keeping the changes minimal, audited, and fully backwar compatible.

    It also provides the protocol with the flexibility to implement fee based burns later without adding unnecessary complexity today.

    Voted yes

Date Voted: November 19, 2025

31. Proposal: [TPP-14] Adjust TokenGovernor Parameters for TPPs (Tally)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: Reducing the voting delay and late quorum extension for TPPs makes the governance process more efficient without compromising safety.

    The Token Assembly has shown strong and consistent participation, also the faster parameters already proven successful for ZIPs demonstrate that the system is ready for more agility.

    3 days delay still provides enough review time, while the 2 days extension keeps quorum flexibility manageable.

    Support the proposal!

32. Proposal: [GAP-4] Adjust GovOpsGovernor Parameters for GAPs (Tally)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: The proposal makes GAP governance more efficient without reducing security.

    The current 7 days delays slow down decision making and no longer reflect the maturity of the Token Assembly.

    Reducing the vote delay and late quorum extension aligns GAPs with the updated parameters already working well for ZIPs and allows the DAO to operate with faster, more responsive governance.

Date Voted: February 20, 2026

33. Proposal: [TPP-15] ZKsync Association Donation (Tally)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I support this proposal.

    The ZKsync Association is the legal and governance backbone of the ecosystem.

    Ensuring it is properly funded safeguards regulatory continuity, token stewardship, and stable governance operations over the next 12 months.

34. Proposal: [TPP-17] ZKsync Immunefi Bug Bounty Program 2026 (Tally)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: Security is core infrastructure for ZKsync and its broader ecosystem. The capped, USD-denominated structure with clear Security Council oversight provides strong controls while ensuring uninterrupted bug bounty coverage.

    Support the proposal!

35. Proposal: [TPP-16] ZKsync Audit Reimbursement Program 2026 (ZARP v2) (Tally)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: Voted yes!

    ZARP v2 improves the structure of the original program, better aligning reimbursements with how protocol security work is actually delivered, while reducing the forward allocation and keeping strict caps in place.

    The limited 2025 reconciliation is clearly scoped and does not create an open ended precedent.

36. Proposal: [ZIP-15] Update ZKsync Security Council Parameters (Tally)

  • Date Voted: April 24, 2026
  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: It right sizes the Security Council to ZKsync’s current stage, keeping strong security thresholds while reducing cost.