Nanostrategy.eth - Delegate Communication Thread

Delegates
1

Hey everyone!

I’m nanostrategy.eth, an early user of zkSync Lite and zkSync Era.

I really care about the values zkSync promotes, like decentralization and security, scalability, Ethereum compatibility and economic freedom. These ideas are important to me, and I’m excited to help this ecosystem grow.

For treasury management, I think we should watch out for those who take more than their share by pretending to be active. Also we need to support those who make real contributions to zkSync’s development.

I’ll use this thread to share how I’m voting.

Feel free to join: https://delegate.zknation.io/dao/delegate/0x83cc1f5ed5f385817dfa73e8051d20501c940b7c

3 Likes
2

Messari has created a comprehensive report on ZKsync Rollup technology. This report, prepared by the company, contains detailed information on technology, governance, elastic chains, the ecosystem, and more.

ZKsync is the END GAME

2 Likes
3

I voted Against “[TPP-001] ZKsync Ignite Program: Creating a Liquidity Hub for ZKsync”

I believe that the campaign is too expensive, and no mechanism has been presented to maintain liquidity after the campaign ends.

4

[ZIP-001] voted FOR
[ZIP-002] voted FOR

I vote “FOR” of these two proposals because they improve the protocol from a technical standpoint.

5

This topic was automatically closed 28 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.

7

I apologize for the lack of updates. Although I haven’t updated the topic, I have participated in all the votes. I will now provide more details


[ZIP-003] Resubmission of Protocol Defense
 Voted For
The same as [ZIP-001]

[GAP-1] ZKsync Token Program Priorities 2025 Endorsement
 Voted For
Approving this proposal will enhance ZKsync’s technology, network, and ecosystem

[ZIP-4] Reduce the execution delay from 21 hours to 3 hours
 Voted For
The same as [ZIP-002]

[GAP-2] Adopt The SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement
 Voted Abstain
I believe this proposal is very beneficial for the security of the ZKsync network, but I abstained because I didn’t have enough time to study it thoroughly. I’m glad it was approved

AAVE DAO Airdrop Claim Extension Request
 Voted For
I believe it would be fair if AAVE received its airdrop and distributed it among its users

Upgrade Governance Contracts
 Voted For
I attended calls where the proposal was detailed and explained by the Matter Labs team

Prepare ZKsync for ZK Gateway
 Voted For
I attended calls where the proposal was detailed and explained by the Matter Labs team. This is a technical update that improves the ZKsync network

[ZIP-7] Lens Chain inclusion on Elastic Network
 Voted For
I was one of the first to vote for. I am excited to see Lens Chain being part of the Elastic Chain. We need more user apps

8

[ZIP-8] Upgrade Chain Creation Params

Voted For
The same sentence as in [ZIP 6] Prepare ZKsync for ZK Gateway, but with the corrected mistake.

[ZIP-9] V27 EVM Emulation Upgrade
Voted For
This proposal will have a positive impact on the protocol and will open the door for new developers and more DApps.
According to my information, Curve will be launched on zkSync after this update.

9

[GAP-3] Authorization for Security Council to Convert Recovered ETH into ZK
Voted Against

[TPP-3] ZIP Audit Reimbursement Program (ZARP)
Voted Against

I am voting against these two proposals because I believe they contradict each other, and I suggest revising both proposals. I don’t see the point in buying ZK to execute proposal [GAP-3], and then selling ZK to execute proposal [TPP-3].

Instead, I propose moving 776 ETH from L1 to L2 zkSync and not rushing to spend them, but rather deposit them into AAVE to earn interest.

As for proposal [TPP-3], I urge to review the budgets.