The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @krst and @Sinkas, and it’s based on the combined research, fact-checking, and ideation of the two.
We’re voting FOR the proposal.
Our primary concern with reducing the execution delay is ensuring enough time for the Security Council to intervene if needed. As pointed out by @Sampka, however, there are at least four entities with 15-minute SLAs to guarantee the response time. On top of that, there are four other entities with 1-hour SLAs. With that in mind, there are 8 Security Council members out of the three who need to initiate a 12-hour freeze, with SLAs to respond in under 3 hours.
The recent test run for the Security Council response time demonstrated the feasibility of adequate response for the majority of the teams involved in the Security Council.
Therefore, we feel comfortable reducing the execution delay to enhance user experience and operational efficiency while still maintaining a reasonable level of security.