As part of @rafa and I’s ongoing efforts to highlight the power of capped minters and thoughtful token mechanics, Rafa and I put together a summary of the key problems they address—challenges that many other ecosystems still grapple with. Given the technical nature of capped minters and token mechanics, we wanted to focus this post on the real-world problems they help solve in order to make the concepts more accessible and relatable to a broader audience.
Capped Minters remove token custody, increase recipient agency, and facilitate oversight
Capped minters are essential infrastructure for running token programs, automating funding mechanisms, and ensuring partners and protocol stakeholders can engage with the ZK token with minimal friction or central coordination:
- The capped minter framework removes the need for minted token custody management and related risks.
- Capped minters allow token recipients to mint tokens at their discretion and the target of their choice, without multisig coordination by the minter administrator.
- Capped minters allow external parties, such as the Token Assembly and Security Council, to participate as oversight. They can cancel the minter or pause it.
Below are some specific examples of how token mechanics achieve this.
Removes intermediary minted token custody management
In other ecosystems, custody of minted tokens is a concern. Capped minters transition program management from “transferring tokens” to “granting minting rights.” They create the opportunity for minted tokens to be received directly by the end recipient.
Increase recipient agency
When someone is granted the minter role on a capped minter, they have the ability to decide when, how much, and to which address to mint. In other ecosystems, tokens are distributed via a transfer and the end recipient has limited onchain agency to determine when to receive minted tokens.
Facilitates oversight
Reduces Multisig Responsibilities & Coordination
Even though token mechanics are starting to enable more automation in Token Programs, there will likely remain a need for oversight committees for certain programs. Capped minters & mechanics significantly reduces the burden on these committees.
-
Incentive alignment and checks and balances can be embedded directly into the design of a mechanism, minimizing risk, improving transparency, and enabling trustless coordination. This aligns with progressing towards “can’t be evil” instead of “don’t be evil” narrative in the ZK Credo.
-
Reduces the number of transactions that need to be signed by committees. Using token mechanics and capped minters reduces the number of potential transactions a committee would have to sign. This enables committees to act more as “Veto Councils” rather than execution bodies. See example below:
-
Committees can be costly. Lessing the burden on the participating members means creating new ways to reduce overhead costs. Over time, capped minters and minter modifiers can be used to automate budget disbursements:
Example Oversight Board Cost Strategic Treasury Management on Arbitrum Committee: DAO Oversight Committee Budget Requested: $180,000 in ARB annually Ignite Program DSC DeFi Steering Committee The DSC requested a monthly budget of 100,000 ZK tokens over the course of the nine month program, for a total of 900,000 ZK tokens (~$54k). STIP-Bridge Operational Budget Committee: STIP Bridge Advisors, Program Manager & Multisig Signers Budget requested: 136,800 ARB total ($52K) TPP-3 ZKsync Audit Reimbursements Program None* (*Security Council serves as support and program pauser) 0
Enhances Accountability
- The Token Assembly can revoke minting rights from any capped minter in relation to Token Programs at any time. The Token Assembly maintains control of each approved program, and is able to cancel a program at any time. For example, if the program is not performing as expected or if there is a fluctuation in markets/token price.
- The Security Council is able to participate in oversight of programs by being granted the pauser role on Token Program capped minters.
- The Capped Minter V2 contracts that were deployed earlier this year introduce a start and end date function, allowing developers to define a specific minting window for each capped minter. This ensures capped minter automatically expires at the end of a program.
- Minter mods enable additional layers of accountability by adding additional constraints on minting rights. For example:
- Rate limiter mod: Limits how much ZK can be minted in a given time period from a given capped minter. This assures the community that any party with minting rights cannot mass mint from their capped minters.
For more information on capped minter design and supporting minter modifiers, please visit the forum and ZK Nation docs. Still have questions? Please drop your questions in this thread so we are able to discuss and learn together as a community!